Ulrikke Eikeri vs Sarlota Cesnekova Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L L L L
Form
W W W W L L W L W LH2H: Eikeri 1 - 0 Cesnekova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Eikeri winning 2 and Cesnekova winning 1. The last match between Eikeri and Cesnekova was at the Oslo, 02-11-2015, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Ulrikke Eikeri getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ulrikke Eikeri | 1 |
| Sarlota Cesnekova | 0 |
Oslo(02-11-2015)
3
6
6
3
6
3
| Eikeri | Stats | Cesnekova |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 647 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 206 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 32 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (400-290) | Career Total W/L | 58% (36-26) |
| $52,453 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Sarlota Cesnekova
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:19:0 | Average Match Time | 2:19:0 |
| 65% (66/101) | 1st Serve % | 71% (68/96) |
| 62% (41/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (35/68) |
| 29% (10/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (9/28) |
| 47% (9/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 54% (52/96) | Return Points Win % | 50% (50/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ulrikke Eikeri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Danilina
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
39%
(
25 of
64)
13
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
23 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jada Robinson
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sarlota Cesnekova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Sarlota Cesnekova
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarlota Cesnekova
Player
Frederikke Svarre
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sarlota Cesnekova
Player
Daria Lodikova
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (400/290) | Win/Loss | 58% (36/26) |
| 57% (880/667) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (82/56) |
| 54% (7342/6294) | Games Win/Loss | 58% (695/508) |
| 57% (120/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) |
| 60% (242/159) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (20/13) |
| 51% (38/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 226 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 648 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 559.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 395.74 |
| 70% (16042/22876) | 1st Serve % | 72% (272/380) |
| 57% (9093/16042) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (146/272) |
| 43% (2947/6834) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (61/108) |
| 50% (1584/3142) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (28/62) |
| 48% (11020/22932) | Return Points Win % | 48% (203/422) |
| 0% (0/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 23% (3/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (23/38) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (248/181) | Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 72% (126/50) | Futures W/L | 59% (35/24) |
| 58% (393/680) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (36/61) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (55/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 51% (88/173) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 87% (400/349) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (40/33) |
| 13% (400/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (40/7) |
| 17% (290/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (22/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
